Filed under: Update
I generally offer this blog every Tuesday and Thursday, but when something happens that affects the portfolio, and I have time, I will post the information.
This afternoon I happened to notice that SJW, the portfolio’s single holding, was down more then 5%. Investigating this I saw that the reason was that the stock had been downgraded by Brean Murray. This company initiated coverage in October as a Buy, downgraded in December to Hold, upgraded the middle of this month to Buy, and downgraded today. The reason for the downgrade was that SJW had met its target price of $43, thus the reasonable switch from Buy to Hold. The Market is currently overreacting to the change, which is beneficial to the portfolio.
There are always times of advance and pullback, and I oftentimes wish to see more of the former than the latter. In this particular case I am about a week away from making another purchase (I will probably make another purchase next Friday), and hopefully this drop will stick around long enough to make the purchase at a fortuitous time. I try to make my purchase on the 7th of each month to remove the element of timing from the equation, and as will certainly be seen in the future, sometimes I will be lucky and other times the opposite will be the case.
Filed under: Consumer Goods
The Prudent Investor portfolio is designed to be safe, that is, safe relative to a more aggressive portfolio. The idea is not to find quick growing companies and capitalize on short term gains, but one where established companies will provide better than average returns over the long haul.
The current downturn in the Market has reinforced the importance of this type of portfolio, and it is in this context that I will look at the performance of each company still in the running in relation to the overall Market.
There have been two days where the DOW has dropped substantially over the past month, 27 February and 13 March. On these dates the S&P 500 dropped a total of 5.5% and the DOW dropped a total of 5.1%. Many things happen during days of large declines, two are notable in this current discussion.
The first is that speculative companies oftentimes take the hardest hit. As volitility is their nature, it makes sense that while the investor gains nicely on the up side, they also lose big on the down side.
The second is that quality companies go on sale and investors move towards the tried and true in an attempt to pick up bargains. As I am seeking to establish a conservative portfolio, I want to remove any companies that have greater losses than the Market on days when things turn sour. Let’s look at the comparisons.
| 13-Mar-07 | 27-Feb-07 | Combined | |||||
| Open | Close | Loss | Open | Close | Loss | ||
| S&P | $1,406.23 | $1,377.95 | -2.0% | $1,449.25 | $1,399.04 | -3.5% | -5.5% |
| DJI | $12,307.49 | $12,075.96 | -1.9% | $12,628.90 | $12,216.24 | -3.3% | -5.1% |
| McCormick & Co. Inc. (MKC) | $38.01 | $37.54 | -1.2% | $39.52 | $38.11 | -3.6% | -4.8% |
| Pepsico, Inc. (PEP) | $63.49 | $62.16 | -2.1% | $64.39 | $62.76 | -2.5% | -4.6% |
| ConAgra Foods Inc. (CAG) | $24.91 | $24.33 | -2.3% | $25.26 | $24.99 | -1.1% | -3.4% |
| Corn Products International Inc. (CPO) | $32.34 | $32.35 | 0.0% | $32.35 | $31.42 | -2.9% | -2.8% |
| Unilever NV (UN) | $26.31 | $26.10 | -0.8% | $26.55 | $26.04 | -1.9% | -2.7% |
| Flowers Foods Inc. (FLO) | $29.15 | $28.46 | -2.4% | $29.44 | $29.35 | -0.3% | -2.7% |
| The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) | $50.02 | $49.60 | -0.8% | $50.10 | $49.71 | -0.8% | -1.6% |
As can be seen, none of the companies lost more on the combination of the two days than the Market as a whole. I do note that on 27 February McCormick did gain this honor, and more recently on 13 March this was the case for Pepsico, ConAgra, and Flowers.
A single day should not make for a decision, as it is certainly possible that other factors were involved, and I have yet to seriously begin examination of the companies. So this begs the question, “How about any other down days – how did these companies fare?”
In my next post I will look at other down days over the past five quarters to see how each company has done.
Filed under: Consumer Goods
Having selected the Processed & Packaged Goods Industry of the Consumer Goods sector, it is time to begin looking at the companies. There are over 50 companies identified by Yahoo Finance to be in this industry, and no, I am not going to look at every one of them. <g>
I will narrow this list by removing those companies for which I can find a compelling reason not to keep. To begin, by removing companies that either do not have adequate information or are not making money, the number is reduced to 34.
The group offers an average P/E of about 29. I am not necessarily against high P/E companies, but they do tend to be rather volatile at times, and that is not the direction of this portfolio. If I allow companies to remain that sport a P/E as high as 25% above the average, then I can remove companies to reduce the list to 23. By the way, this removes the well-known Sara Lee Corp.
If you read how I selected the water utility that sits in the portfolio (or numerous messages around the Internet), then you will know that I am no fan of debt. There are a number of companies that have more debt than equity, so by removing them the count is reduced to 15. There are some notable companies that are dropped at this point – General Mills, Del Monte Foods, Campbell Soup, and the most significant for me, Kellogg. This company has significance in the regard that I currently hold it in my DRiP portfolio.
As I have so many companies from which to choose, I will remove companies that either offer no dividend, or a dividend less than 1%. This reduces the count to 10. Amongst this group id Diamond Foods, which processes, markets, and distributes nuts of all types. I gorged myself with them years ago in the press box at the Emerald Bowl in 2004.
So ten companies is a reasonable number from which to select, but I am going to make one more cut – I am removing companies with a Market Capitalization of less than $1B. I am looking to include a large, solid company, and removing small caps from the list yields the following list:
| Company | Market Cap |
| Pepsico, Inc. (PEP) | 103.42 |
| Unilever NV (UN) | 74.35 |
| ConAgra Foods Inc. (CAG) | 12.74 |
| McCormick & Co. Inc. (MKC) | 4.98 |
| The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) | 2.81 |
| Corn Products International Inc. (CPO) | 2.34 |
| Flowers Foods Inc. (FLO) | 1.78 |
It almost looks like the longer the name, the smaller Market Cap. <g>
In my next post I will begin looking at each company in this list.
Filed under: Consumer Goods
Having narrowed things down quite a bit, it is time to select an Industry in the Consumer Goods sector.
Here is what I have been looking at:
| Industry | P/E | ROE % | Div.Yield % | Debt to Equity | Net Profit Margin (mrq) | Price To Free Cash Flow (mrq) |
| Beverages – Soft Drinks | 25.7 | 18.2 | 2.37 | 0.656 | 8.1 | 75.0 |
| Food – Major Diversified | 18.4 | 11.5 | 2.928 | 0.69 | 6.0 | 114.9 |
| Processed & Packaged Goods | 12.9 | 28.3 | 2.547 | 0.799 | 9.3 | 45.2 |
I have highlighted the values that beat the rest of the group. The key to understand here is that I am looking for something that will give me comfort, which might not necessarily be meaningful to someone else. For instance, a P/E of 12.9 is certainly lower than 25.7, but the companies that offer the lower P/E may not necessarily be better companies to purchase. That said, I am looking to make money and be able to sleep at night.
In that respect, how do these industries react to a major decline. Well, we very recently had one – the worst since 9/11 – so let’s look at how they reacted.
| Industry | 27 Feb Open | 27 Feb Close | % Decline in Index |
| Beverages – Soft Drinks | 996 | 972 | 2.41% |
| Food – Major Diversified | 995 | 965 | 3.02% |
| Processed & Packaged Goods | 1000 | 977 | 2.30% |
Food – Major Diversified acted more severely than the other two. All of these are better than the 3.27% drop on 27 February, with Processed & Packaged Goods reacting least severely.
So Processed & Packaged Goods will be the industry in which the next purchase will be made. Others may offer greater possibilities, but when it comes to safety as well as potential, I am confident that this is a good direction to take. Certainly, there is a company within this industry that will prove itself worth as the second company to enter the Prudent Investor portfolio.
Filed under: Consumer Goods
Last post I noted the industries in the Consumer Goods sector that would be considered. Looking into the future is something that nobody can do, so I will be looking at current numbers in the hopes that they will help determine the most profitable path.
There are two numbers that very nicely separate this grouping into IN and OUT baskets. Return on Equity (ROE) is an indicator of profitability. Obviously, we want to invest in an area of profitability, and dividing the Net Income over the past twelve months by the shareholder’s equity (resulting in a percentage) is one means of measuring this. Eight of the fourteen industries have double-digit ROE values.
Net Profit Margin is another indicator of success. This value is obtained by dividing the income by the revenue (again, resulting in a percentage), and basically represents the percentage of revenue resulting from the income. Companies that can do more with what they’ve got than others get a nod.
Looking at the numbers for each of these industries I see a clear dividing line right down the center – seven companies have a value of 6 and above, while the other seven have a value less than 2.5. All seven of the former have double digit ROE, so we have whittled the industries down to:
- Cleaning Products
- Appliances
- Processed & Packaged Goods
- Dairy Products
- Beverages – Soft Drinks
- Business Equipment
- Food – Major Diversified
I am seeking an established company, and while growth is always advantageous, I have harped about debt long and hard in the past. As I have not changed my mind that an established company should not be wallowed in debt, I am going to remove Dairy Products and Business Equipment, as their Debt/Equity ratios are both above 1.
Finally, I do like the comfort of a dividend. In a case where a company’s price does nothing, at least the investor receives dividends as payment for holding the stock. Three industries average Dividend Yields over 2% and two average under 2%, so removing the latter removes Cleaning Products and Appliances.
This leaves me with three industries:
- Processed & Packaged Goods
- Beverages – Soft Drinks
- Food – Major Diversified
In my next post I will make a decision as to which industry to select so that I can begin looking at companies.
Filed under: Consumer Goods
Now it’s time to start thinking about the next purchase. SJW Corp. falls in the Utilities sector, so here is a list of the other sectors:
- Basic Materials
- Conglomerates
- Consumer Goods
- Financial
- Healthcare
- Industrial Goods
- Services
- Technology
I believe that a company in the Consumer Goods sector will be the second company to be added to the portfolio.
Alas, note the number of industries in this sector is as follows:
|
|
|
How am I going to select from such a wide grouping? Well, since I am looking to create a conservative portfolio that should survive the ups and downs of the market as time passes, Consumer Goods is an excellent sector for selecting a company that will survive, regardless of the direction of the economy. Whereas some industries will suffer with an economic decline, others will not, and that will be my focus.
For instance, I will not be looking to purchase a company in the Photographic Equipment & Supplies industry because if the economy falls into a tailspin then this industry will suffer. In such a situation, people will continue to buy food, but will put off purchasing a new camera.
So which industries match this idea? Opinions may vary, but here is my list:
- Appliances
- Auto Parts
- Beverages – Soft Drinks
- Business Equipment
- Cleaning Products
- Dairy Products
- Farm Products
- Food
- Meat Products
- Office Supplies
- Packaging & Containers
- Paper & Paper Products
- Processed & Packaged Goods
- Rubber & Plastics
You will notice that I have excluded alchohol and tobacco from my list, despite the fact that they are excellent survivors of economic downturns. Personally, I have always been wary of litigation against these industries, especially tobacco, and am not willing to accept this additional risk. Your mileage may vary.
I removed Textiles from the list because although we all need to replace worn clothing, this industry includes many of the high-end companies (Eddis Bauer, Liz Claiborne, Perry Ellis, etc.).
I removed auto manufacturers but not auto parts – the latter might actually do better in a negative economic environment if people are opting to fix their cars, as opposed to buy new.
Next post I will further narrow the industries in an attempt to make a selection. I try to get these posts out on Tuesday and Thursday, and since I will be in Syracuse, NY for a film festival towards the end of the week, if you do not see a post on Thursday then it will be because I was not able to establish an Internet connection. Alas, I will not have an Internet connection, so the next post will come on Tuesday.
Filed under: Update
The idea of INVEST% (which came to me through MoneyPaper) is very simple, and with the modification I added to it for multiple companies (which I will explain at a later time), I have found that it works very well. Simply put, when the company is down, buy more, when it is up, buy less. By attaching a predetermined calculation to it, emotional investing is removed from the mix, and we have all seen emotional investing destroy portfolios.
In this scenario I am planning to make a $100 purchase each month. Since I am required to purchase whole shares, seldom (if ever) will the purchase actually come to $100, but I will round the number of shares either up or down to accommodate. However, if the stock’s price is high relative to what it has been over the past year, then I will purchase less, if it is low relative to what it has been over the past year, then I will buy more. The actual amount could vary by 50%, so if the price is at its 52 week high, then I will make a $50 purchase, if it is at its 52 week low then I will make a $150 purchase.
The formula for this is:
((1 – ((Current Price – 52WeekLow) / ( 52WeekHigh – 52WeekLow))) + 0.5).
Solving for SJW at this point is time we have:
((1 – ((36.06 – 21.16) / (45.33 – 21.16))) + 0.5), or
((1 – ((14.90) / (24.17))) + 0.5), or
1 – .616 + 0.5,
or 0.88.
This tells me to make a $88 purchase. Since I cannot purchase partial shares, I should round things to the nearest whole share, which would be 2 shares.
Now that I know how much will be used in the purchase, the next thing to do is to decide when to make that purchase. As noted, I like to take the timing element out of things, so I have always made my Dividend Reinvestment Program purchases on the 7th of the month. There’s absolutely nothing special about that date, it was a random number I selected simply to make things easier.
All of this is a guide to making a decision and can be overridden at any point, if there is sufficient reason. So the “blind aware” blind investing indicates that we are using a predetermined calculation to guide us, not make the final decision. I am pretty certain that I will be sticking to this formula, though I will always have freedom to change my mind.
This means that a purchase should have been made yesterday, and indeed this was done at lunch. I did make a mistake, however, and purchased 3 shares instead of 2 shares, but that is of little consequence.
I have put together a Google spreadsheet which is located at http://tinyurl.com/2q2hsd, and a link to it can be found to the left of this text, so tracking the progress of the portfolio will be easy.
Next week I begin the journey of deciding the next company to be added to the Prudent Investor portfolio.
Filed under: Update
I wrote about blind investing long ago, and it’s time to bring the subject back up again. There are two types of blind investing, one that makes sense to me and the other that does not. I’ll start with the latter.
Perhaps “blind blind” would be the best way to characterize the type I am not fond of. In this scenario, one acts a particular way regardless of the circumstances. I think that this methodology was a contributor to the crash (if I may be slightly dramatic) on 27 February. As I write this, nobody has a firm answer as to the cause of the big decline. The reasons are varied – China, the submortgage market, and numerous other possibilities are mentioned – I would be inclined to believe that each had its part to play. However, I also think that blind blind investing may have also been part of the problem.
An example of blind blind investing is when one sets a stop on a position – sell the equity if the price drops to a predetermined value. The idea is that if the stock’s price falls to a certain level, regardless of reason, then it will be sold to prevent a further loss. Of course, what often happens is that stocks that take very short dips end up getting sold during the dip, so the investor has then sold at the low point. I would not be surprised to find that after the Market started falling on the 27th, computer programs looking to react to this began selling, which made for lower prices, which in turn made for more selling. I would be willing to bet a week’s pay that this was a major reason for the DOW dropping over 200 points literally within minutes on the afternoon of that day.
In my mind, this “blind blind” way of doing things just is not a good idea.
The other kind of blind investing, which I’ll refer to as “blind aware,” is quite different. It recognizes that trying to time things can be not only frustrating, but downright impossible. I tested this with the knowledgeable investors at The Motley Fool about seven years ago. Intel had taken a big plunge on a Friday, so I sent a message asking people if they were going to take immediate advantage of the downturn. All responses, with the exception of one, indicated that Monday morning they would be buying heavily. By the end of that following week Intel had continued to plummet (and did so for the next few months). The overwhelming consensus was completely wrong.
Indeed, the first purchase of SJW took advantage of a major drop in the stock’s price, and it has continued to fall. The saving grace here is that the intention is to make multiple purchases over time, and this is where the “blind aware” part comes in.
It is my intention to purchase six companies for the portfolio, initially funding each position with about $500, and making $100 worth of purchases during each month. At this point I only own a single company, so the description as to how I will decide to invest when more than one company is in the portfolio will come at a later time. For now, I will use a methodology called INVEST%, which was introduced to me long ago by MoneyPaper.com. I will explain how this works in my next post.
Filed under: Update
A good deal of this whole thing is an experiment in a number of ways. I’ve never made a portfolio public before (since writing for The Motley Fool seven years ago, I’ve always been willing to state the positions I’ve held), so that is an experimental first for me. I’ve also never publicly explained most of what I am doing when making a company and purchase selection, so that is also a first.
Another experiment is the use of Zecco.com, and so far I am glad to report that things have worked out satisfactorily.
In my last post I mentioned that I had sent a check to them on Friday to fund my account. Today, during a lull at work, I happened to notice that the Market was down about 375 points. A big smile came onto my face. Sure, this is the sort of thing that calls for tears for most, but DRiPpers are a different breed.
Dividend ReInvestment Programs (DRiPs) allow the shareholder to make numerous purchases over time, oftentimes without cost. A downturn in the Market is not cause for despair – quite the opposite. As long as one has selected quality companies and is looking at the long term, they know that things will come back. The drop in the Market means that things are on sale, and don’t we all love sales?
The only question was whether or not I would be able to take advantage of this situation. I had only sent the check on Friday, and when I logged into my Zecco account on Tuesday I found that the money was sitting there, ready to be used. I had already spent almost two months to come to the decision to buy SJW, so this plunge could not have come at a better time. I like to smile.
I placed a limit order for 15 shares of SJW and got them at $35.51. This is more than $2 less than yesterday’s closing price, a 5.5% drop. By the time you read this it is certainly possible that it may have fallen even more, but at this point I am satisfied with the dumb luck of the timing of the first purchase for this portfolio.
| Initial funding: | $1,000.00 |
| Purchase 15 SJW @ $35.51 | -$532.65 |
| Balance: | $467.35 |